As volunteers, we’re not supposed to have favorite children. We’re “neutral”--like parents and Switzerland. But…we’re humans. There are some kids that we naturally get along with better than others, just like the kids sometimes prefer one of their aunties to the others. Peter is one of those kids for me. On the fourth or fifth day I was here, he asked me a question—just because he was curious—and I spent ten minutes and drew several diagrams in the dirt to explain why it’s warmer in Kenya than it is in Germany or the United States. He hasn’t stopped asking me questions since, and I love it. I love that he’s curious, engaged, and willing to ask. As many of you know, though, the problem with smart kids who ask questions is that sometimes there’s no good answer. This was one of those conversations:
Peter walked up to me with his fifth grade social studies book open in his hands, “Auntie, it says that flowers are a cash crop in Kenya. Why?”
“Because…because they…” Oh crap.
“I mean, you can’t eat them; they are just growing, and you can’t make anything with them.”
These are all very good points. “Well, but people in other parts of the world buy them because they’re pretty.” Because they’re pretty?! Oh no. “The flowers grow well in Kenya, so they grow them and cut them here, and then they fly them to Europe where they’re sold at the market to make money.” Well, that sounds like quite the luxury.
He nodded, but then…”No, Auntie, you can’t cut flowers because if you cut them, they just die very fast.”
Oh, Peter. That’s the way it’s supposed to be. “Usually that’s true, but after they cut them here, they keep them very cold when they fly them so that the flowers are still fresh when they get to the market, yeah?”
Unconvinced, but clearly too polite to say that he’s just decided that people in Europe are crazy, he answered, “Yes,” and walked away, leaving me to wonder why in the world cut flowers are a cash crop. (Notice I had cleverly avoided answering why—mostly—and instead answered how.)
The reality is that the cut-flower industry, mostly roses, in Kenya is a multi-billion dollar industry right up there with tea and coffee. (This article--http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/20/kenya-flowers-iceland-volcano--gives you an idea of just how much money is involved.) During my wildlife management studies, we drove by row upon row of greenhouses lined up along Lake Naivasha while our professors told us about the low-wage jobs and prodigious amounts of chemical pesticides that the industry was providing to the area. Lake Naivasha, the center of floriculture in Kenya, was dedicated as a Ramsar site (Google it) in 1995. The water-dependent habitats of Naivasha—specifically papyrus wetlands and yellow fever acacia forests—are especially conducive to birds, with an estimated 495 migratory or resident species passing through each year. It’s also unusual because it’s freshwater. Most of the Eastern Rift Valley lakes, including Naivasha’s famous neighbor Lake Nakuru, are saltwater. According to an IUCN document published in 2005, floriculture and horticulture farms cover approximately 50 km2 of area surrounding the lake (the native papyrus shoreline is currently at 12 km2). They are virtually all irrigated from the lake and comprise an immense 50% of the approximately 63.7 million m3 of water that is drawn annually from Naivasha. Much of the rest of the water abstraction (and water pollution) is from the population boom that followed the estimated 30,000 jobs the floriculture industry is directly responsible for. Rumor has it that the demand by European markets for fair-trade and pesticide-free flowers is starting to trickle down, but fair-trade flowers still use water and land, and imagine trying to scale down or change a functioning operation that makes that much money in a country with a 2010 estimated per capita GDP of $1600. (CIA)
Of course that brief paragraph doesn’t cover a fraction of the ecological considerations, or even touch on the economics. Interestingly enough, the studies that maintain that the floriculture industry around Naivasha does not significantly affect the water table or pollute the lake are written, researched, and funded by Dutch scientists and universities. The wholesale flower markets in Amsterdam being one of the largest buyers of Kenyan-grown flowers.
One of the main focuses of our wildlife management semester at SFS was on human-wildlife conflicts. Most ten year olds in the United States would tell you that it’s wrong to kill an elephant, but if that elephant just destroyed your family’s entire subsistence farm for the growing season, it’s easy to see how that wouldn’t be a black and white issue. Floriculture strikes me the same way. Directly employing 30,000 people in a country with a 40% unemployment rate is no small feat. (CIA) On the other hand, using approximately 30 million m3 of freshwater to water flowers for export in a country that has recently and persistently been plagued by drought and famine (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/08/world/africa/08kenya.html) seems irresponsible.
I hope someday Peter will be able to work on a resolution.
CIA. The World Factbook. 1 March 2011. 9 March 2011. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ke.html.
IUCN/LNRA. Lake Naivasha: Local Management of a Kenyan Ramsar Site. Management review. Naivasha: IUCN Eastern African Regional Programme, Nairobi and Lake Naivasha Riparian Association, 2005.